
First, the math – Nikon’s screen has 307,200 pixels , as compared to Canon’s 230,000 pixels, so your preview screen is better on the Nikon’s.
(Continued after the Jump)
The browsing is similar to that of the Canons and Nikon’s of the past, however, I get the feeling that the Nikon is just a bit clearer. But, who’s going to buy a camera because of the LCD screen? It’s not like it’s a cup holder decision in a car!
What might sway you to upgrade is Live view, and both have it. The screens are similar in terms of readability, and there’s now a second navigation “joystick” above the one we’re used to on the Canon, so you can navigate the screen without having to take the lock off the navigation wheel on the back.
- Nikon vs Canon – Introduction
- Canon – A first look
- Nikon – A first look
- Nikon vs Canon -The Noise Issue
- Nikon vs Canon -The MegaPixel Issue
- Nikon vs Canon – Shooting Tethered
- Nikon vs Canon – The LCD Screen
- Nikon vs Canon – External Ports
- Nikon vs Canon – Buttons and Access
- Nikon vs Canon – Card slots
- Nikon vs Canon – The Future
- Nikon vs Canon – Conclusions
Please post your comments by clicking the link below. If you’ve got questions, please pose them in our Photo Business Forum Flickr Group Discussion Threads.
Originally published on Photo Business News & Forum on December 8, 2007. Comments are closed; this post is part of the archive.
Slobodan
(a Canon owner)
Regards.
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4512/nikon-vs-canon-competition-for-pro-dslr-market-heats-up.html
“New LCD for D3/D300 has 640x480x3 (RGB Stripe array filter) = 921,600 dots. Rounded to 920,000 dots.”
And Ken Rockwell writes:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm
‘It has 920,000 RGB dots or 307,200 pixels (640 x 480), “
So, if you want to call each R, G, and B as one pixel, go ahead. In the end, each R G and B combined results in a single “dot” of color.
What IS remarkable is that it’s not your typical 72dpi screen, it’s 287 dpi.
Call it what you want, I gave the Nikon a win on the LCD.
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikond3/page3.asp
The difference is really quite significant.
Yes, you’re right, and that’s a nice feature for Nikon that Canon doesn’t have – Canon must get the focus before going into liveview.
Canon is QVGA = 320×240= 76800 full RGB pixels.
So Nikon has 4 times the area resolution as Canon. Period
It’s funny how an ill informed PopPhoto article can influence and misdirect people so long after it has been proven inaccurate.
For all the Nikon fanboys crying about it, what’s more important than the numbers is that in reality, the difference in detail between the two is INSIGNIFICANT (I’ve seen both also)
ME (Nikon user, not fanboy though)
Great Review!
The Canon HAS a sensor cleaner.
The Nikon does NOT have a sensor cleaner! (on full frame this is unforgivable).