This section of a newsletter (at right) landed in my inbox lat night – 8/24 at 5:00:26 PM EDT because I am a past Modern Postcard client, and then at 9:23:16 PM EDT, my inbox gets the following below: 
One of the sentences in it is:
we stated to “skip the expensive photo shoot” by using iStockphoto instead. We sincerely apologize as this miscommunicates our intentions and our feelings about professional photography…The two co-founders of Modern Postcard started their careers as photographers and are intensely loyal to the photography profession.Sorry – someone “intensely loyal” wouldn’t do that. Maybe someone “loyal” by accident, but intense? No.
(Continued after the Jump)
They go on to stand by the statement with the excuse:The target audience of this service is small / home office businesses on a limited budget that have never been able to afford quality photography and therefore have never used it.No, your “target” audience was the revenue that your photographer “friends” earn serving these businesses, and I got one, so the e-mail blast certainly wasn’t targeted at all. Further, I have, in the last six months, done assignments that were portraits of home office business owners and other small businesses, and let me tell you, setting up a 9 foot seamless in someone’s living room for a full length portrait isn’t easy.
When you say:
We enjoy a strong relationship with the artistic community and will continue to do everything possible to help them promote their talent and grow their businesses.you can start by firing the marketing person who allowed this nonsense to occur in the first place. This would fall into doing “everything possible.” Your staff should be keenly aware of the landscape of it’s clientele, and the challenges we face – and the problems with microstock are well publicized to be sure.
They invite comments, so send yours: customercare@modernpostcard.com.
Please post your comments by clicking the link below. If you’ve got questions, please pose them in our Photo Business Forum Flickr Group Discussion Threads.
Originally published on Photo Business News & Forum on August 24, 2007. Comments are closed; this post is part of the archive.
I’ve always been happy with MP, the service and printed cards.
Even with the apology, they are going to loose customers over this and even worse, their reputation is not tarnished.
Wanna bet that PDN writes it up?
The right person would be he/her who signed the iStock deal. Unless of course the iStock deal was worth more than future business from expensive photographers.
How is your example of the full length portrait connected to this ad? The ad is for stock photos rather than portraits of the business owners, isn’t it?
It is an example of the fact that these “home-based businesses” are in fact my client, and thus, this ad is targeted at diminishing the freelance photographer’s assignment base – including me, hence the sentence:
“…I have, in the last six months, done assignments that were portraits of home office business owners…”
— John
if we all vote with our pocket books, this type of derisive attitude towards professional photographers will be less frequent industry wide.
Fake.
I guess the spin has started.
Sorry you lose.
Someone dropped a large one over this and its going to be all over the net faster than you can download a CF card.
Thanks for bringing it to our attention John. Certainly focusses the mind on the next promo splurge for sure.
PP
Why is the path everyone seems to take these days exclusively related to lowest cost/price?
I’m proofing a job right now that I’m sending to MP.
Er, was planning on sending to MP.
Hey, here’s an idea, skip the expensive printing job! Gang up a bunch of copies of your promo and go down to your local copy shop. They can run them off of their copiers for about 50 cents a page.
You cut them apart yourself and bypass the expensive printing process!!
The sentiment’s the same…no?
http://www.pdnpulse.com/2007/08/modern-postcard.html
asus w1000g battery
asus silver a42-w1 battery